1,4-Dioxane – a threat in products?
What is it?
1,4-Dioxane is associated with cancer in humans. 'Presumably'.
Presumably? Don’t we know?
The classification of 1,4-dioxane varies in different regions of the world, but in 2022, the Australian industrial chemicals regulator (AICIS) reclassified it from a ‘suspected human carcinogen’ to a higher level, ‘presumed human carcinogen’.1 This is also the classification in Europe.2
This means there is evidence from animal and/or human studies suggesting 1,4-dioxane could cause cancer. But not enough evidence to definitively classify it as a ‘known carcinogen’.
Let’s assume it does cause cancer in humans.
Very small amounts of 1,4-dioxane can be detected in some cosmetic, personal care, cleaning and other products. It isn’t there as an ingredient but is an impurity that forms during the manufacturing of certain other ingredients.
What's the myth?
Because 1,4-dioxane can be detected in some cosmetics, personal care and cleaning products, it has been suggested that these products are unsafe.
It’s a case of ‘same myth, different substance’…trace amounts being equated with risk of harm.
So, do you need to worry about traces of a presumed carcinogen in some of your products?
No, the levels are too low to pose a concern. Read more below.
What are the facts?
-
Industry has phased 1,4-dioxane impurities to trace levels
1,4-Dioxane is not an ingredient in cosmetic and personal care products, it’s an impurity.
The cosmetic and cleaning products industries have focused on decreasing contamination by 1,4-dioxane as much as possible, with great success.
According to the 2022 AICIS assessment,1 ‘contaminant levels of 1,4-dioxane have declined substantially over time’. For example, the majority of cosmetics now contain 1,4-dioxane levels below 10 parts per million (ppm). In other words, less than 0.001%.

Impurity – why?
1,4-Dioxane is an unavoidable by-product of the ethoxylation reaction, which is used to make many chemicals including some surfactants.
Careful control of the reaction conditions and subsequent removal can minimise 1,4-dioxane levels but it cannot be removed completely. -
Authorities agree these trace levels do not pose a risk to product users
The European Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) estimated the lifetime cancer risk posed by trace 1,4-dioxane levels in cosmetic products.3 (This kind of estimation considers long-term exposure to multiple low-level of a substance.) The SCCS determined that ‘a trace level of 1,4-dioxane in cosmetic products of ≤10 ppm is safe’.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) evaluated the risk to consumers from using surface cleaners, dishwashing products and laundry detergents that contain 1,4-dioxane as a contaminant. It concluded that these uses ‘did not present an unreasonable risk’4.
-
Just because 1,4-dioxane is present doesn’t mean it causes harm
Just because 1,4-dioxane is in a product doesn’t mean it will cause cancer in the amount present.
You need to consider the level of exposure (how much 1,4-dioxane) and how you are exposed (skin contact, inhalation, consumption, injection?). For more on this, see Extra! Extra! Toxic chemicals found in... (Dose matters!)
Going back a while was the headline ‘Toxins found in children’s shampoos’5. The kind of headline that causes alarm. And outrage. How DARE they harm our babies! The article went on to report that 1,4-dioxane was in some baby products at approximately one part per million (1 ppm, or 0.0001%). A scary headine, but a very very low amount.
You would need to wash your baby’s hair 620 times a day, every day, to get close to a harmful level of exposure to 1,4-dioxane from baby shampoo, according to the Canadian Health Department.6
Simply a media beat-up.
-
Not much 1,4-dioxane gets through the skin
Skin contact is the main way you are exposed to ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products. And many of these products would be rinsed off your skin after a short time.
It’s known that human skin doesn’t absorb much 1,4-dioxane. One study found that only 0.3% of an applied dose of pure 1,4-dioxane penetrated excised human skin when it was allowed to evaporate, and only a little more (3.2%) penetrated when prevented from evaporating7.
Skin absorption studies by the US EPA ‘determined that 1,4-dioxane evaporates readily, further diminishing the already small amount available for skin absorption, even in products that remain on the skin for hours’.8
-
1,4-Dioxane is regulated for safety in Australia
1,4-Dioxane is included in Schedule 6 of the national Poison Standard9.
How does that protect you? It means cosmetic/personal care products that contain more than 10 ppm 1,4-dioxane need to be labelled with the word ‘POISON’ and have a child-resistant closure.
As you can imagine, this effectively sets a 1,4-dioxane limit of 10 ppm in cosmetics and personal care products, because what brand will want to have to slap a POISON warning and protective cap on its (for example) baby wash? Not great for sales.
AICIS, Australia’s industrial chemicals regulator, assesses chemicals like 1,4-dioxane as required. Like if new information comes to light or an overseas jurisdiction changes its assessment of risk. AICIS considers the public risk from 1,4-dioxane to be suitably managed by the existing controls in Australia.
The bottom line?
Any trace levels of 1,4-dioxane in your products do not pose a health risk.
No need to…
worry!
But please do...
continue using your favourite products with confidence.
Sources
- Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme, 30 June 2022, ‘1,4-Dioxane Evaluation statement’
- European Chemical Agency, ‘Member State Committee support document for identification of 1,4-dioxane as a substance of very high concern because of its hazardous properties which cause probable serious effects to human health and the environment…’, adopted on 17 June 2021
- Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), ‘SCIENTIFIC OPINION ON The Report of the ICCR Working Group: Considerations on Acceptable Trace Level of 1,4-Dioxane in Cosmetic Products’, Adopted 15 December 2015
- US EPA, Final Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane
- Sydney Morning Herald, 29 March, 2009, ‘Toxins found in children’s shampoos’
- Cosmetics Alliance Canada, ‘The Safety/Risk Equation’ (YouTube video)
- See ECETOC (1983) Joint Assessment of Commodity Chemicals, No. 2, 1,4-Dioxane for a summary
- US FDA, 1,4-Dioxane in Cosmetics: A Manufacturing Byproduct
- Therapeutic Goods Administration, The Poisons Standard (the SUSMP)